Recommended tools
We recommend using a small stack of tools that each tackle a different source of token waste.
- RTK reduces noisy terminal output so Claude Code sees the important parts of command results without all the extra clutter.
- Graphify turns your project into a queryable knowledge graph so Claude Code can answer questions by querying the graph instead of reading and grepping raw files.
- MarkItDown converts PDFs, Office documents, and other heavy file formats into clean Markdown so Claude Code reads them without the formatting boilerplate that inflates token counts.
- Headroom trims prompt bloat while preserving the structure and information Claude Code needs to work effectively.
- Engram gives Claude Code persistent memory across sessions so useful context sticks around — even surviving compaction — without forcing every session to start from scratch.
- Caveman cuts Claude Code's output tokens by making its responses terse, attacking the response side of the bill that the input-focused tools above leave untouched.
Or you can download the Headroom app, which runs Headroom and lets you turn on optional one-click add-ons like RTK (terminal output), MarkItDown (document conversion), and Ponytail (leaner code) from inside the app.
What results should you expect?
Don't expect every prompt to suddenly cost half as much. Do expect the noisy stuff to get dramatically cheaper. Across normal usage, combining these tools cuts Claude Code token costs by around 50%, which means you get about 2x more usage out of the Claude plan you already have.
Which workflows benefit most?
The biggest gains usually come from repetitive, machine-generated inputs: build logs, JSON arrays, shell output, and multi-step debugging sessions. Our benchmark section shows exactly that pattern, with the highest-noise workloads seeing the biggest savings.
How should you evaluate these tools?
Don't judge them on toy prompts. Pick a real Claude Code task you already do, compare token count before and after, and then decide whether the savings are worth rolling out more broadly. If you want the practical details, the FAQ covers privacy and rollout, and the pricing section helps you estimate payback.